Sydney airport seizure of phone and laptop ‘alarming’, say privacy groups
Border Force detain British-Australian software developer Nathan Hague, apparently at random, for 90 minutes
Over the last year I read a few articles like this one especially about people tavelling to the US. Seems Australia is following suite.
To quote part of the article:
[i]Under new legislation, proposed last week, the ABF would be given additional search powers and the penalties for individuals refusing to provide access to the ABF to evidence held in a device for example, refusing to share their password to unlock a device would be up to five years imprisonment, or 10 for serious offences.
An exposure draft of the bill revealed the obligation to assist police and other agencies in unlocking devices, including by de-encrypting data, would extend to tech giants such as Facebook, Apple and Google.
Steele-John and other privacy advocates have raised concerns over the new legislation.
The scope and overreach of the new Border Force powers is terrifying, and has much broader consequences and implications than just individual privacy, in the context of this incident which occurred at Sydney airport.
Keeping data private
Professor Michaels recommended that people who wanted to protect their data should not carry devices across international borders.
If you are doing sensitive work, keep your files on your computer encrypted, or go one better and do not take your computer with you through Customs. Put it on the cloud where the GDPR [EUs General Data Protection Regulation] is in force and lease a laptop in your given destination, she said.
But that advice is of little comfort to Hague, who said the actions of the ABF officers had put his business in breach of Europes tough new GDPR data privacy laws and he would now need to give privacy breach notifications to his clients.
I dont mind people looking at the files if thats one of the directives, but you have to give clear definitions and you also cant leave the international business travellers exposed like this to having fines or breach notices being served by their own clients.
[/i]